Compare and contrast two articles with opposite viewpoints (opposing Essay

Comp be and contrast two holds with opposite viewpoints (opposing articles) - quiz ExampleThe authors claim that research testifys that the difference in the cognitive abilities of girls and boys are trivial thus, there is no gain in opting for single-sex classrooms in popular schools. Aside from the high cost of setting up these classrooms, it also goes against the federal law which requires that schools should make available their resources to both sexes. The authors conclude their article by stating that single-sex classrooms do non make any sense. On the other hand, beating-reed instruments establish, Girls and Boys Thrive in Separate Classrooms issuance the opposite side by arguing that single-sex education is a valid and compelling option (Reed 542). The article mentions that the learning styles of girls and boys differs therefore, there is a need to promote single-sex classrooms. Moreover, the author mentions that students who graduate from single-sex classrooms perfo rm better and are more prepared for college than those who attend coed schools (Reed 542). Reed cites several statistics and researches to justify her argument that single-sex classroom is the route that the acres must take if it wants to remain competitive (543). These two articles will be compared and contrasted to determine which one is a more persuasive and effective discussion on the issue of single-sex classrooms. ... In the fourth split Reed cites a study of secondary schools and colleges which showed that single-sex schools for females provide better educational opportunities and occupational achievements (Reed 542). On the other hand, Barnetts and Rivers style is less direct. They do not present their position in the first part of the essay rather, they mention about a schools superintendent plan to create two single-sex public schools. Unlike Reed, the readers are not made aware of their stand until the middle part of the essay. The style of Barnett and Rivers is to show examples of single-sex classrooms and how it affects the performance of the students. The mention of statistics is not predominant in the article unlike that of Reeds. Barnett and Rivers article lacks the tide over of statistical data. They mention that the theory that there are major gender differences in the processing of development between boys and girls have been debunked but they fail to present evidence of such, unlike Reed who supports her theories by citing statistics. The using up of statistics makes Reeds article more convincing and believable. A notable style of Barnett and Rivers is shown in paragraph 8. Contrary to Reeds style, they include a statement in their article that single-sex classrooms are practiced provided the resources are there (Barnett and Rivers 540). They agreed to the opposing position but immediately contradict it by saying that there is a catch to it. Reed on the other hand, never mentions that coed classrooms are good. Instead, she strengthen s her position by presenting the drawbacks of her argument but refutes it by discussing the results or a research made among more than 450 schools (Reed 542). Both