Perspectives of Organisational Culture

Perspectives of Organisational CultureWhat is organisational burnish all about? How did the concept arise?The idea on civilisation in faces is a concept drawn from anthropology (Meek, 1988). Culture is viewed asa system of divided up symbols and meanings (Rossi and OHiggins, 1980 cited in Lee an Yu, 2004 p. 340). Culture in cheeks basin simply be referred to as an placements way of life or way of doing things. Organizational last has been defined differently by several writers. However, most of the definitions in enforce lay emphases on key elements such as, norms, customs dutys, values, beliefs and assumptions. Organizational agri nicety bath be defined as the collection of relatively uniform and unchanging values, beliefs, customs, traditions and practices that are shared by an organizations members, learned by new recruits and ancestral from one generation of employees to the next (Huczynski and Buchanan 2007, p.623). There is little doubt that organizational finis i s a broad topic which no essay buns talk of in entirety, however this essay will discuss the two approaches to the study of organizational culture and aim to critically evaluate the slipway in which managers attempt to control organizational culture, drawing examples from the Hewlett Packard video watched in class and previous flummox of visiting Tesco stores.History forms part of an organizations culture and it foot be transmitted consciously and unconsciously over clock from managers to employees. For example, it can be transmitted in the form of stories and myths (Meek 1998, Kaye 2007, Taylor S., Fisher D. et al).(Dandridge, T., Mitroff I. et al) offer that stories, myths and symbolism, aid understanding of the deep culture and structure of an organization. These stories and myths in an organization might be about the start up of the organization or on the remarkable successes of its founders. For example, in the Hewlett Packard video, it indicated that the HP history or ganise part of the HP way as a vast publication of the employees were aware of the fact that the founders (Bill and Dave) started the company in a garage, in 1939. They authentic the oscillator, used by Disney in the movie Fantasia. The bell ringing tradition was introduced by Bill and Daves wives as a signal for their husbands to observe tiffin or coffee times (The gilded cage video watched 23 November, 2009).According to (Schein 1985 cited in Huczynski and Buchanan 2007, p.624 630) culture is considered to exist in three levels. take one is regarded as surface manifestations. At this stage, the culture of an organization is intimately seen by outsiders in its symbols, language or architecture. In the Hewlett Packard case, the open intent office adopted, manifests, the relaxed environment the employees work in, and it also invokes the ease of access, amid managers and employees. Tesco is very(prenominal) customer-centric and this is displayed by each employees approach to customers which, pay backs a message regarding Tescos organizational culture of putting smiles on the faces of the shopping public, hence, creating a pleasant shopping experience for them. The second level of culture is values. This has its firm foundation on morals, ken and religious or societal precepts and is usually displayed on websites of organizations. The last level of culture is basic assumptions. These are assumptions preconceived by an individual of an organization such as how it operates and functions in its environment.Several writers hold different views on organizational culture. The three perspective framework developed by (Martin, 1992), integration, eminence and fragmentation perspectives provide understanding on organizational culture. The Integration or unitary perspective regards organizations as clear, consistent and unified, believing that these integrating features whitethorn result in improved organizational effectiveness. The differentiation perspective views organizations as consisting of subcultures with diverse interests and different objectives while the fragmentation or conflict perspective, sees organizations as being in a constant state of flux. The integration or managerial perspective appears to suggest that there is a relationship between strong culture and improved performance. (Scholz, 1987 cited in Huczynski and Buchanan, 2007, p.623) argues that culture generates competitive advantage. However, sustainable competitive advantage, must be rare, adaptable and non-imitable this determines the strong cultural traits the organization possesses (Barney, 1986 cited in Huczynski and Buchanan, 2007, p.641).Is organizational culture controllable? According to (Meek, 1998 p.455) previous studies suggest that culture belongs to solicitude, hence, it is available for management to manipulate. The functionalist perspective holds that culture can be controlled, as it is regarded as something that the organization has and gives to n ew recruits and they do non take part in the formation, hence, it can be used as a control device by management (Smircich, 1983). However, the social constructionist perspective, rejects the notion, that culture may be controlled as it holds that culture exists through the continuous fundamental interaction between the organizations members. (Ackroyd and Cowley 1990, Harris and (Ogbonna 1999, Ogbonna 1993, Willmott 1993 cited in Huczynski and Buchanan, 2007).There exist three forms of corporate control, bureaucratic, humanist and culture control. More than other forms of control, however, culture control elicits sentiment and emotion,and contains possibilities to put up workers in a hegemonic system (Ray, 1986, p287).(Deal and Kennedy, 1982 cited in Ray, 1986 p.289) echoes that it is the explicit challenge to management to make people . . . have a strongly ingrained understanding of the companys valuesThus, aligning with the functionalist perspective which, supports that culture can be controlled, managers can thus, control culture, by ensuring that employees hold fast to the custom and practice of the organization. For example, in the HP video, meetings were held regularly to check the progress of team members and also to convey information to the employees as the need arises. Job security was tied to performance. Objectives setting was done top-down, bottom-up (objectives were set by management and accepted by each employee). The management by wondering around (MBWA) style was in force, as it enabled managers keep abreast with happenings in the company, and employees likewise had accessibility to managers to discuss issues.